Nistune Forums

Why would you need to see both bin files - they are all different and it will be like day and night when compared? If the engine worked great with a certain bin a month ago, I suppose using this very same bin today should cause no issues. But it doesn't work this way. There must be something wrong w...

Matt, there should be something wrong with the whole nistune thing on my ECU. It is IMPOSSIBLE to get it tuned. Every day I am facing a different issue, causing weird problems. This is to describe how absurd the situation is: I have the license since.. I don't know how long, should be a month or so....

I guess this should be here - P10 SR20 83J: viewtopic.php?p=18034#p18034

I am finally making a progress, which makes me think everything with the adr file is fine now. Load scales are properly set. At WOT I barely touch last column. Idle is determined by bottom-left 4 cells. Car runs good now. Still plenty of work to do, mainly on ignition table. K seems to be proper as ...

Hi Matt,

Thanks for fixing the *.adr for me! Things look much different now and finally make sense.

Martin

Anyone please?

Hi, I've been trying to tune my ECU for quite some time already. Unfortunately with no success. Usually I am very close to what I pursue as a target, but I always meet certain limitations. Vehicle is P10 Primera SR20DE, 83JXX. 370cc injectors and N15-1N4xx-P11 MAF. Below are several tables which loo...

Thanks! I was able to obtain 14.7:1 both ways - with VE values as they are and, lowered to 128. The difference in the K value was minor (1 or 2). The initial K value right after the injectors/MAF change was 215. I had to lower it down to 205, which makes the rough starting point quite sharp actually...

Hi guys, I am dealing with a 83J P10 ECU, where the VE table is also present. As usually, the whole fuel map has the o2 flag on. The current setup includes 370cc injectors and P11 MAF. After applying the new injectors and MAF, I end up with the rough estimate of the K which needs correction. All fil...