Everything is sooo true what you have said ! I will add just few my thoughts.
PL wrote: 1) Gives you about 20% more power than equivalent 98 tune
from tunes, what I have saw, I would say you in Australia have better quality 98 than we have here in Lithuania. And e85 gave me about 25% more power. Added I think 8 degrees ign and it wasnt the limit. Was scared to add more
PL wrote:5) Smells great!
This point I like the most
PL wrote:Baaaad:
2) You'll use about 30% more fuel
Why this is bad, apart that you need bigger injectors? I would say this is just fact unless you are going to 24h race or something
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Here e85 is cheaper aprox at the same 30%. How about you ?
PL wrote:
5) Oil contamination can be an issue, so regular oil changes are the go. Particularly bad if the car is used for short runs and doesn't get to warm up properly. On longer runs the contamination will tend to boil off.
3) It attracts water, so you can't leave it sit around. Fine for daily drivers. Bad for track cars. You really should drain your tank and store it in a sealed container between meets
so, 3) point I would say it depends on how much you drive. Maybe we should not divide by track or daily, because you can use your track car every weekend, and your daily could be just few miles from home to job. Just to make clear.
PL wrote:I tune for 0.82 to 0.84 lambda. On an AFR meter setup for petrol this will read around 12.4 AFR unless you can adjust stoichiometric point for the wideband from 14.7:1 to 9.7:1. In reality E85 isn't critical when it comes to mixtures. I've found that I can tune much richer or much leaner than ideal and power often won't be affected.
The same here. Also I tried to play with mixtures on boost transition, but 0 results. Does it possible to make it spool up faster changing mixtures ? Maybe ign? Any advice?
PL wrote:I've hijacked your thread enough...
This thread now balanced with theory and practice
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)