Hello,
this enchancement should not be very difficult to pull off. I've noted that some RPM scales are off.
I'm using Type 1 board with CA18DET engine. Engine RPM in both pictures below are 825, I think this kind of small adjustments would make Nistune a much nicer user experience. I hope you can fix this soon
RPM scales for Idle timing and Accel. Increase
Moderator: Matt
RPM scales for Idle timing and Accel. Increase
- Attachments
-
- rpm_scale2.png
- (34.36 KiB) Downloaded 3105 times
-
- rpm_scale1.png
- (35.59 KiB) Downloaded 3105 times
Re: RPM scales for Idle timing and Accel. Increase
what version are you using?
some of these scaling bugs may have been fixed in 0.10.19.
some of these scaling bugs may have been fixed in 0.10.19.
Re: RPM scales for Idle timing and Accel. Increase
I'm using the latest stable version (0.10.13R).
Okay, good to know. Hope those changes reach the stable release someday.
BTW: here is another one, BOTH scales seems to bee off... Just look at the consult and you'll see.
Okay, good to know. Hope those changes reach the stable release someday.
BTW: here is another one, BOTH scales seems to bee off... Just look at the consult and you'll see.
- Attachments
-
- idle_ign_scales.png
- (31.91 KiB) Downloaded 3081 times
Re: RPM scales for Idle timing and Accel. Increase
CA18 is a problem because the tables there are half the size. I'm looking into it at the moment
Re: RPM scales for Idle timing and Accel. Increase
Okay these are fixed along with tracing. Just CA18 being different sized tables (TTPmin/max = 8 compared to 16 normally, Idle/Decel RPM timing = 32 compared to 16 normally). Verified with hardware maptrace
Re: RPM scales for Idle timing and Accel. Increase
In the earlier versions File>Config>Filtered Tables in later versions right click and 'filtered tables'. This will fix the timing offset display used in CA18 (but you cannot edit the filtered cells directly then only +/- to value)BTW: here is another one, BOTH scales seems to bee off... Just look at the consult and you'll see.
Gone through CA18 and made the following adjustments to scaling which differ from rest of address files
m_pAddress->SetMapXMin(CAddress::TTP_MIN, 0);
m_pAddress->SetMapXMax(CAddress::TTP_MIN, 2800);
m_pAddress->SetMapXUnits(CAddress::TTP_MIN, 400.0);
m_pAddress->SetMapXMin(CAddress::TTP_MAX, 0);
m_pAddress->SetMapXMax(CAddress::TTP_MAX, 2800);
m_pAddress->SetMapXUnits(CAddress::TTP_MAX, 400.0);
m_pAddress->SetMapXMin(CAddress::TTP_MAX2, 0);
m_pAddress->SetMapXMax(CAddress::TTP_MAX2, 6400);
m_pAddress->SetMapXUnits(CAddress::TTP_MAX2, 800.0);
m_pAddress->SetMapXMax(CAddress::ADD_FUEL, 3200.0);
m_pAddress->SetMapXMin(CAddress::TP_RECOVERY, 3200.0);
m_pAddress->SetMapXUnits(CAddress::TP_RECOVERY, 200.0);
m_pAddress->SetMapXMin(CAddress::DWELL_DUTY, 0.0);
m_pAddress->SetMapXUnits(CAddress::DWELL_DUTY, 400.0);
m_pAddress->SetMapXMax(CAddress::DWELL_DUTY, 12400);