LS2/LS7 coils and DWELL Time

If it isnt a problem or a suggestion it probably goes here.

Moderator: Matt

Matt
Site Admin
 

Posts: 8993
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Re: LS2/LS7 coils and DWELL Time

Post by Matt »

Next on my TODO list...
skylinegtrhr
 

Posts: 301
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 1:50 am
Location: Croatia
Contact:

Re: LS2/LS7 coils and DWELL Time

Post by skylinegtrhr »

Here is some good info about coils

http://efi101.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t ... c&start=20

When time comes I'll by Lances coils... A lot of satisfied customers
Matt
Site Admin
 

Posts: 8993
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Re: LS2/LS7 coils and DWELL Time

Post by Matt »

Ive updated nistune 1.2.1 to display dwell times. Tested in er34 and s14 prior to the accident

Adjust the dwell vs volt table to use larger coils

(ECUs have a pulse processor which reduces pulsewidth as rpm increases. The dwell vs rpm table is to compensate for this to maintain a fixed dwell time. Most Nissans about 2ms. Dont adjust the rpm table)

Increase dwell volt for larger coils and watch the dwell duty length gauge. Updates every 10 seconds

Currently support s13-s15, r32, s13 ca18. Can add others on request.

limits i mentioned before will not affect how we set that table either
Nuyskov
 

Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:52 pm

Re: LS2/LS7 coils and DWELL Time

Post by Nuyskov »

[quote="Matt"][/quote]

Hello, Matt!
Don't see such option on ER34 and WC34 - didn't make it?
Matt
Site Admin
 

Posts: 8993
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Re: LS2/LS7 coils and DWELL Time

Post by Matt »

It is on the big gauges on R34. Latest test version. Just put another updated version up yesterday
supersayianjim
 

Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:43 pm
Location: saint joseph M.O.
Contact:

Re: LS2/LS7 coils and DWELL Time

Post by supersayianjim »

so which table do i adjust now again?? the duty cycle or dwell time??

so if i put 3.0-4.0 across the table for the dwell time, would that do it??
supersayianjim
 

Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:43 pm
Location: saint joseph M.O.
Contact:

Re: LS2/LS7 coils and DWELL Time

Post by supersayianjim »

Image

is this the right way to go about it??
Matt
Site Admin
 

Posts: 8993
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Re: LS2/LS7 coils and DWELL Time

Post by Matt »

Not sure what you are trying to achieve doing that.... you need to raise the dwell time if you want longer pulses

See what I did with my R34 to get about from 2.5-3ms to about 5-6ms (this is from memory so watch the gauge... don't use my example verbatim)
Attachments
r34_dwell_adjust.png
(58.99 KiB) Downloaded 7278 times
supersayianjim
 

Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:43 pm
Location: saint joseph M.O.
Contact:

Re: LS2/LS7 coils and DWELL Time

Post by supersayianjim »

but wait. aren't I supposed to be between 3-4 ms for optimal firing?? and in that chart above do I copy the red line or the purple line?
Ben C
 

Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2013 9:09 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: LS2/LS7 coils and DWELL Time

Post by Ben C »

The y axis scale is in percent,not milliseconds, so you are not setting a specific dwell time.

You increase the original values as per matts post. Otherwise if your method was correct the stock dwell time would be enormous.


The dwell time is increased as battery voltage drops to ensure the coils are charged fully.
Matt
Site Admin
 

Posts: 8993
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Re: LS2/LS7 coils and DWELL Time

Post by Matt »

You can see from what I did (in red) that I effectively doubled the dwell time (%) compared to factory (in purple)
supersayianjim
 

Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:43 pm
Location: saint joseph M.O.
Contact:

Re: LS2/LS7 coils and DWELL Time

Post by supersayianjim »

kick ass matt. with that dwell adjustment I made 350whp at 15psi and stupid rich at 9afr. will include the map I used later.

Image
Matt
Site Admin
 

Posts: 8993
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Re: LS2/LS7 coils and DWELL Time

Post by Matt »

Good stuff. I have the feeling the coils are on the way out on my RB25 NEO so this may be an option now :D
STATUS
 

Posts: 119
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:30 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: LS2/LS7 coils and DWELL Time

Post by STATUS »

The Coils to get are:
C1512
D514A
OEM part 12573190

These are all part numbers for the same denso coil. Lots of testing has been done on all the variants and this one does not false fire (effectively uncontrolled added advance) at higher dwell levels like the others. There are plenty of documented engine losses due to this artificial advance (sometimes upto 20 degrees)

They retail at $280 for 8 so you will have 4 or 2 left over either way. We have made over 1000rwhp with them and they are ultra reliable.

We just finished a GTR with nistune and had no issues at around 500rwkw with these coils and modified nistune dwell settings.

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/CHEV-LS2-LS3 ... add&_uhb=1
Attachments
coil.JPG
(8.5 KiB) Downloaded 7215 times
Ben C
 

Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2013 9:09 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: LS2/LS7 coils and DWELL Time

Post by Ben C »

STATUS wrote:The Coils to get are:
C1512
D514A
OEM part 12573190

These are all part numbers for the same denso coil. Lots of testing has been done on all the variants and this one does not false fire (effectively uncontrolled added advance) at higher dwell levels like the others. There are plenty of documented engine losses due to this artificial advance (sometimes upto 20 degrees)

They retail at $280 for 8 so you will have 4 or 2 left over either way. We have made over 1000rwhp with them and they are ultra reliable.

We just finished a GTR with nistune and had no issues at around 500rwkw with these coils and modified nistune dwell settings.

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/CHEV-LS2-LS3 ... add&_uhb=1

Thanks for sharing that. They are the type I have which I believe are the coils on the current commodore.



If you could share the modified tables that would be great, as from my experience it seems both tables need adjusting to get an optimal result.

Thanks
Ben
Post Reply